Lexicon of Terms

By Robert G. Kent & Tammy  Stump

Largely based on Appendix A: Glossary of Terms from

 

Butner, J.E., Gagnon, K.T., Geuss, M.N. Lessard, D.A., & Story, T.N. (10/13).  Utilizing topology to generate and test theories of change.  Revise and Resubmit at Psychological Methods.  

Patricia Karathanos, M. Diane Pettypool, Marvin D. Troutt, (1994) "Sudden Lost Meaning: A

Catastrophe?", Management Decision, Vol. 32 Iss: 1, pp.15 - 19

 


Typical Plots in Dynamical Systems

Below are various types of plots which commonly occur in dynamical systems papers. Unless linked to another original source, the figures below are also reproduced from:

Butner, J.E., Gagnon, K.T., Geuss, M.N. Lessard, D.A., & Story, T.N. (10/13).  Utilizing

topology to generate and test theories of change.  Revise and Resubmit at

Psychological Methods.

There are two main classes of diagrams that are used in dynamical systems: state space plots and phase portraits.


State space plots 

In this figure, the central set point is an attractor, indicated by incoming arrows on either side:   >  < . Low and high negative affect are repellers, as shown by the outgoing arrows moving away from the ends of the line. If a repeller were present in the middle of the data range, it would be shown as a coupled pair of outgoing arrows <  >  .


This figure represents the same information that was displayed in the previous plot, but emphasizes the strength and direction of change in negative affect that occurs at specific values of negative affect.  The slope of the line is negative, indicating the presence of an attractor.  At the leftmost point on the line, we see relatively large, positive changes in negative affect.  At the rightmost point on the line, we see relatively large, negative changes in negative affect.  In either case, values are moving closer  the set point (where change is 0).


In these plots, we see how a state space plot is created from a person’s data.  Plot a is a time series representation of a single person’s negative affect over 21 days.  To create plot b, for each day, next-day negative affect (using a lag function) is subtracted from same-day negative affect, yielding scores that represent change in negative affect.  Plot b displays these changes in negative affect as a function of negative affect.  Note that time is not included in this plot; the emphasis is on what changes occur at particular levels of the variable.


These state spaces show multiple features, 2 attractors and 1 repeller.  Attractors are indicated by line sections with a negative slope in plot a, and by arrows that point toward each other in plot b.  Repellers are indicated by line sections with a positive slope in plot a, and by arrows that point away from each other in plot b.


Plots c and d show an example of state space from one person’s data where 3 features (2 attractors and 1 repeller) are present.  As in the one-dimensional example, to create the state space plot, for each day, next-day negative affect (using a lead function) is subtracted from same-day negative affect, yielding scores that represent change in negative affect.  Plot d displays these changes in negative affect as a function of negative affect. A cubic function is used for the fit line, indicating the presence of three features - in order, one attractor, one repeller, and one attractor.


State space plots can also be used to illustrate the effects of control parameters. In this plot, we see that partner’s negative affect changes both the strength and value of the attractor for female negative affect.  When males are higher in  negative affect is  the slope of the line is steeper, meaning the attractor is stronger.  The set point is also slightly higher.

Two-dimensional state space

State spaces can also represent changes in more than one variable.  The arrows depict the combination of female and male negative affect that a couple changes to given their current values for negative affect.  Darker arrows indicate larger changes in values.  All arrows moved toward a single point, indicating a fixed point attractor.  Changes are larger when a partner’s affect is farther from the fixed point attractor.


Phase portraits

This figure is a phase portrait of positive and negative affect.  Three features are shown: a fixed point attractor, a saddle, and a spiral attractor.  In light gray, the null clines are depicted; these are the areas where a single dimension does not change.

 


This is is an epigenetic landscape by Waddington (1957).  In this version of a phase portrait, topological features are indicated by the texture of the surface.   Raised edges represent repellers, while valleys represents attractors.  The positions of the ball represents the current state of the system.  Just as the texture of this surface restricts the flow of the ball, in a dynamical system, attractors and repellers restrict the dynamics of the system. This portrait specifically represents the phenomenon of tissue differentiation.  Once cells begin to organize into one tissue type (in the figure: once the ball reaches one valley), they continue to develop in that manner due to the structure and energy flow within the system.  


This figure shows a manifold, a space with properties such that the region surrounding any point resembles Euclidian space (i.e., is definable by a coordinate system; see Shelhamer’s 2011 chapter).