Economics 1740

                                                                     Spring 2006

                                                                        BUC 105

Monday-Wednesday

11:50 AM to 1:10 PM

                                                           

Peter Philips                                                  

Instructor                                                       

BuC 2

office phone: 585-6465

home phone: 466-3159

e-mail: philips@economics.utah.edu

http://www.econ.utah.edu/faculty.html

See PHILIPS under http address above for slide show of first two weeks of lecture.

 

 

office hours: (by appointment and 11:00-11:50 Mondays and Wednesdays)

 

I will not have office hours the week prior to exams.  This is to discourage last minute studying and to encourage early effort.  If you cram late, you will do so without my assistance.  Study, and we study together.  Cram, and you cram alone.

 

I am also usually in my office during the weekdays and sometimes on the weekend.  You are welcome to drop by any time.  Call ahead if possible so I can be sure to be there when you come by. You are welcome to call me at home before 9 p.m. on week-days and after 9 a.m. and before 10 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday.  You may also E-Mail me messages or leave a message on my office answering machine.   If you would like an “office visit” on the phone, feel free to call me at any time.  If I am busy I will let you know.  Otherwise, we can chat.

 

Economics 1740 is a survey course in American economic history. There are no prerequisites for this course.  This reading list will introduce the subject matter of the course, the reading assignments, the testing procedures and the various arrangements for organizing the class.  Please read this syllabus carefully.  It contains answers for most of the questions that arise in a course such as this.

 

Brief Biography of the Instructor.

 

The instructor, Peter Philips, received his Ph.D. from Stanford University in 1980.  His areas of specialization are labor economics and economic history.  Publications in economic history include: "Competition, Racism and Hiring Practices Among Early California Manufacturers" with Martin Brown in Industrial and Labor Relations Review, October, 1986; "Technological Change and Payment Systems" with Martin Brown, Business History Review, March, 1987, "The Emergence of Job Ladders and the Persistence of the Gender Division of Labor" with Martin Brown, Cambridge Journal of Economics, June, 1986,  "Craft Labor and Mechanization in Nineteenth Century American Canning" with Martin Brown, Journal of Economic History, September, 1986, "The Transition from Outwork to Factory Production in Lynn Boot and Shoe Industry" in Sanford Jacoby, ed., Masters to Managers: Historical and Comparative Perspectives on American Employers, 1850 to 1950, Columbia University Press, 1991, Portable Pensions in Casual Labor Markets, the History of the Central Pension Fund, Quorum Books, 1995, "Women, Technology and the Gender Division of Labor in Manufacturing,” Research in Economic History Vol. 16, 1996 (co-authored with Jens Christiansen and Mark Prus) pp. 103-126, "A Step in the Right Direction  Friedman's New Estimates of Union Membership: The United States, 1880-1912," Historical Methods, A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History,  Volume 32, Number 2, Spring 1999, pp. 87-92.

 

However, Professor Philips’ primary area of research is in labor economics.  Those publications are not listed here.

 

 Professor Philips received the Superior Teacher Award from the College of Social and Behavioral Sciences in 1982 and the Presidential Teaching Scholar Award in 1993. 

 

Subject Matter:

 

            This is a fifteen-week general survey course of American economic history.  It begins with the colonial economy on the Atlantic coast in the 1700s and traces the development and geographical expansion of industrial capitalism across what becomes the United States in the Nineteenth Century.  The focus in the period between 1800 and 1900 will be on a) the expansion of commodity and labor markets; b) the rise of the modern corporation; c) the development of technology, and d) the rise of unions and public education.  In the Twentieth Century we will look at the growth and instability of the developed American economy with a special concern for labor market issues associated with women, minorities and the union movement.  This focus on industrial organization, technology and the labor market reflect the expertise and interest of the instructor.  Other survey courses in American economic history might well emphasize other issues such as Southern slavery, the development of the West, the emerging role of government and so on.  Basically, you cannot cover everything in ten weeks, consequently, I have chosen to emphasize areas I am interested in and in which I have published research.  The Heilbroner text book is more general than the lectures and students should be aware that issues not covered in class but dealt with in the book may nonetheless still be on the exam. 

 

Required Texts:

 

            The required text for this course are

 

1.      Robert L. Heilbroner and Aaron Singer, The Economic Transformation of America: 1600 to the Present, Fourth  Edition, Harcourt Brace College Publishers, San Diego, 1999.

2.      Terkel, Studs, Hard Times, An Oral History of the Great Depression, New York Press, 1986.

3.      Diamond, Jared, Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies, W.W. Norton, 1999.

(Used versions of any of these books are fine.)

 

 

 

Credit-Non Credit:  Many students taking this course may do so credit-no credit. I encourage students to consider this option.  The purpose of credit-no credit option is to encourage students to "take chances" in academic disciplines with which they are not familiar. If you have any questions regarding credit-no credit procedures, please ask me as early as possible during the quarter.

 

Learning Handicaps:  The testing instruments in this class are essays with a multiple choice option.  Lectures are fast paced and the reading may be difficult for some. If you have any learning handicap such as dyslexia or other medical condition, if you are just now learning English or if for any other personal reason study in this class may prove unusually difficult, please consult with me after class or in my office early on in the quarter.  I have some experience in advising students with study handicaps and in customizing exams for specific problems.  So I may be of help to you.  If English is not your native language, you may find it helpful to tape the lectures.  I do not write on the board as much as some instructors, and taping lectures may help you develop better lecture notes.

 

Key Dates:

 

Classes begin

Monday, January 8

Last day to drop (delete) classes

Wednesday, January 17

Last day to register, elect CR/NC, or audit classes

Monday, January 22

Last day to withdraw from classes

Monday: January 29—Book Report on Guns Germs and Steel Due

Monday: February 26—Midterm Exam

Friday, March 2

Last day to reverse CR/NC option

March 17 to March 25—Spring Break (yea!)

Monday: April 2—Oral History of the Great Depression Term Paper Due

Friday, April 20

Classes end

Wednesday, April 25

Reading day

Thursday, April 26

Final Exam for this class:  Wed., May 2, 2007 10:30 am – 12:30 pm

 

Examinations:

 

There is a midterm and final exam, both essay exams, in class plus two papers.

 

Both the two midterms and the final will be essay questions but if you wish, I can provide a multiple choice questions option for part or all of the midterm or final. The midterm, final and each paper are equally weighted, 25% each. 

 

The exams are closed-book.

 

If you miss a midterm for whatever reason, there are no make-ups.  Your final grade will simply be the grade you receive on the two papers and the final exam weighted equally. You must take the final exam to pass the course.  If you cannot take the exam at the scheduled time, you must make prior arrangements with the instructor to take the exam at another time.

 

Incompletes will be granted on rare occasions of illness or emergency.  These will be judged on a case-by case basis by the instructor.

 

Papers:

 

The first paper is a book review of a section (or part) of Diamon’s Guns, Germs and Steel.  This review should be done with one other person in the course.  In this review you must 1) summarize the arguments of the section (or “part”) of the book—you choose the section, 2) your partner chooses a different section of the book.  You and your partner jointly write a comparison of the arguments and evidence in the two sections you have chosen.  How do they relate to each other? How do they support each other and the overall argument of the book?  3) Finally, you write the third part of your essay alone.  You critically evaluate the section your have chosen to review. 

 

The second paper is an oral history of three people in the Great Depression.   Look at Terkel’s book for examples.

 

Readings:

 

Reading comprehension is crucial to doing well in this course.  Here are three tricks to improve your reading comprehension.  First, underline or highlight your reading.  Avoid highlighting more than 25% of what you read.  Aim for about 15%.  Make sure your underlines focus on the topic sentences of paragraphs and the introductory paragraphs of various sections within a chapter.  Second, read actively, asking questions of the reading as you go. Among other questions to have in mind, ask:  how does this fit into what has gone before?;  Is the argument I am currently reading compatible with or contradictory to other readings in the course or the lectures?;  Can I summarize what the author is trying to say?;  Can I critically evaluate the argument?  Third, review your previous reading each time before beginning new reading.  Always attempt to see how new readings fit into and emerge from earlier reading.  Read a little each night.  Avoid cramming. For more on this see the appendix on study habits and exam taking skills.

 

Also, a hint on preparing for the test.  Underline as you read.  Review your underlines of previous reading prior to beginning the new reading.  Read a little bit each night rather than large amounts in one sitting.  Read actively asking yourself questions of the reading.  Ask: "Can I summarize the overall argument to this point?"  "Can I summarize the author's most recent line of argument?"  (In the case of the photocopied readings) "Can I relate, compare and contrast this author's work to the text book and/or to other authors?"  "How does what this author says fit into or contradict other material which I have read?"  Active reading, periodic review, careful underlining, staying up with the material, constant and attentive class involvement are the keys to doing well in this course. 

 

READINGS AND LECTURES.

 

 

Weeks One through Three:

Heilbroner, all of Part One (Chapters 1 through 3: Jan 8 to Jan 24).

Diamond, Guns Germs and Steel--All

 

This section discusses a) what is economic history, b) what was the influence of European economic history on the development of this country, c) it describes the colonial economy and discusses the transition from the colonial economy to early U.S. capitalism.  This night's lecture will introduce the course and its requirements, review some of Heilbroner with a focus on the transition from the colonial firm to the specialized firm of the early 1800s.  The first lecture will focus on the relative development of the Eastern and Western Hemispheres from 10,000 BPE to 1500.  You should master issues regarding the rise of agriculture, the relative interaction of nomadic hunters and gatherers, pastoralists and farmers.  Also covered will be some discussion of the rise of cities and or armies.  The second lecture will also focus on the concepts of material life and economic life as well as the notion of a market economy contrasted with traditional societies.  From these readings and lecture you should understand the relation between the rise of the market and the transition in the functions of the firm from general to specialized economic agent.  You should also be able to distinguish hierarchical exchange from exchange based on equivalences.

 

Monday: January 29—Book Report on Guns Germs and Steel Due

 

Weeks Four and Five (Jan. 29 to Feb. 7):

Heilbroner, Chapters 4 through 6

 

            This section will focus on the rise of manufacturing covered in Heilbroner but will concentrate on the specific issues associated with the movement towards factory production. The lectures will include a discussion of the colonial economy, the transformation from the colonial merchant to the specialized firm to the beginnings of the modern corporation.  The lectures will also discuss a dispute over the rise of the factory system and modern manufacturing.  The lecture will summarize a thesis by Stephen Marglin.  Marglin has a controversial, "radical" thesis:  factories came about to enhance the ability of bosses to supervise and sweat workers.  According to Marglin, factories were not initially technological advances; they were institutional devices designed to enhance the power of employers.  David Landes directly opposes Marglin's thesis (incidentally, they are both professors in the same economics department at Harvard University).  Landes says that the putting out system and the subsequent factory system were advances in the ability of society to efficiently produce things.  Bosses are not (according to Landes) people who extracted more work from workers through close supervision, they were inventors of more efficient organizations of production.  Thus, a debate is established.  Marglin argues that the factory system was successful because it brought workers in from the outwork system.  In the factory they could be watched and thus made to work harder.  Furthermore, close supervision could cut down on waste and theft.  Thus, the factory system was not more efficient.  It did not increase the total productivity of society.  Still it was profitable because it redistributed the benefits of production away from the worker towards the boss.  Landes, in contrast, identifies the factory system with the steam engine and centralized power.  He claims that the factory system did raise the overall productive capacity of society and therefore was more "efficient" than previous technologies.  Christiansen and Philips seek a middle ground between the two extremes in a case study of the rise of factory production of shoes in Lynn Massachusetts.  They claim that the first factories in Lynn, stitching shops which just employed women were not more productive than women's outwork labor.  They did, however, allow the "boss" to join in the benefits derived from the newly invented sewing machine.  It is not a case of close supervision sweating workers but rather of finding a way for the boss to won and thus profit from the means of production, the sewing machine.

 

The rise of the factory system brought about, eventually, a whole new social division of labor.  Not only was the distinction between employer and worker more sharply drawn but also the distinctions among workers was more finely delimited.  In particular, there emerged a detailed division of labor within production with each worker along the assembly line doing a task which was marginally different from those done up and down the line.  With these distinctions there emerged a hierarchy within the factory and lines of progression from worse to better jobs.  In this lecture, we ask the question what accounts for the emergence of job ladders and the allocation of groups such as men and women across good and bad jobs.  The student should have a good understanding of the concepts social division of labor, detailed division of labor, general skills and firm specific skills. The student should also understand the two competing explanation for internal hierarchy within the firm.  Were job ladders primarily learning ladders designed to teach workers the skills of work once the craft apprenticeship systems were eliminated or were job ladders a method of divide and control strategies designed to offset the potential worker unity caused by the destruction of exclusive craft unions?

 

Week Seven and Eight (Feb 12 through Feb. 21)

 

Heilbroner Chapters 7 and 8

 

 

Three lectures will be presented—one on child labor, one on slavery and one on the rise of the modern corporation.

February 26 (Monday) Midterm Exam

 

Weeks Nine and Ten (Feb 28 through March 7):

 

Heilbroner Chapters 9 through 11

 

Of Saints and Sinners

 

The Gold Rush in California transformed a basically pre-market neo-feudal Spanish/Mexican society into a highly dynamic, largely male, market organized society.  Not only did settlers come from the East and Europe, they came from China.  At one and the same time, white settlers sought to exclude slavery and the Chinese.  These two weeks explore the relationship between racism and the market.  This lecture I entitle the Economic History of Saints and Sinners--a comparative study of the beginnings of San Francisco and Salt Lake City.  I compare the role of the market in organizing the development of San Francisco to the role of the LDS Church in organizing the development of Salt Lake City (an Utah).  How did each respond to the completion of the transcontinental railroad? To the economic crises of the 1870s?

 

Week Eleven and Twelve: (March 12 to March 28) :

 

            In this section I will discuss the rise of unions in the U.S. as they relate to the rise of labor markets and manufacturing.  Nineteenth Century legal developments regulating unions will also be covered.  You should be aware of the Philadelphia cordwainer (or shoemaker) case which declared unions criminal conspiracies, the Massachusetts case Commonwealth versus Hunt which modified the doctrine of criminal conspiracy applied to unions, the yellow dog contract which made union rejection a condition of employment and the blanket injunction which severely restricted union activities.  You should know the general history of the four strikes covered by Brecher from 1877 to 1919.. 

 

            This completes our discussion of Nineteenth Century labor markets and firm structure (actually up through World War I).  There are five basic areas you should understand.  First, questions concerning the rise of the product market and how that affect peoples lives as consumers, producers and members of families and communities.  How did the rise of the product market relate to the rise of labor markets?  Also you should be able to relate the rise of the product market with a second issue: the rise of the modern corporation.  How did firms evolve from general, low volume colonial firms to specialized, higher volume firms in the first half of the nineteenth century to the horizontally integrated and vertically integrated firms of the latter half of the last century.  What was the role of market? of technology? of labor in this transformation?  How did the evolution of the firm affect the evolution of production and work?  Third, you should be able to relate the rise of labor markets and the modern corporation to the rise of the union movement and the movement for public education. How did economic changes lead to and/or respond to legal changes in regulating unions and requiring education?  Fourth, also you should have a firm grasp of the background issues associated with the European invasion and settlement of the Western Hemishpere.  Fifth, emergence of a modern wage labor force and the corresponding conflict between unions and corporations should be understood.

 

Monday: April 2—Oral History of the Great Depression Term Paper Due

 

Week Thirteen through Week Fifteen (April 2 through April 18)

 

The Great Depression and World War II

 

Heilbroner, chapters 12 and 13.

Studs Terkel, Hard Times (All)

 

            In these chapters in Heilbroner we continue our consideration of depressions within the American economy.  Here we consider the Great Depression of the 1930's and the government's response: The New Deal.  We will also go back to the Nineteenth Century and review the business cycle of that era.  We will find out that the Great Depression was really the third or fourth great depression this country has experienced and we will consider parallels with the economic stagnation of today.

 

 

Week 16 (April 25 to 25):

Heilbroner, chapter 14 through 16.

 

 

            This lecture covers the post-war period which will be divided into two parts, a period of prosperity from the World War Two to the Vietnam war and a period of slow-growth and stagnation from the first oil shock to the recent boom. 

 

Final Exam for this class:  Wednesday, May 2, 2007 10:30 am – 12:30 pm

 

 


 

 

 

 


These are sample multiple choice questions like those that will be on the examinations if you choose a multiple choice option. 

 

1. Heilbroner argues that history must be written from a perspective, highlighting one theme or another from our "total" history.  Why does Heilbroner take this position?

 

a. Because Heilbroner believes that all historians have biases and that no one can write a truly "objective" history.

b. Because Heilbroner believes that the ruling class of every society will force its vision of society on all the classes of that society.  So a history of slavery written in the South during the time of slavery will reflect the perspective of Southern slave owners no matter who is the individual writing the history.

c. Because "total" history involves too much material.  An all encompassing history can never be written.  The historian must be selective and focus on selected themes to the exclusion of other issues.  Some may focus on political history while others focus on the history of jazz.  The choice of a theme is a decisive determinant of what we find in "history".

d. all of the above

e. none of the above

 

2. Which of the following is a key aspect of the mercantilist system?

 

a. It focused on production as the key source of profits

b. It used market competition as its main regulating force.

c. Through its emphasis on mercantile trade it increased the number of trading partners any one country or colony would have.

d. all of the above are key elements of the mercantile system

e. none of the above

 

3. Immediately after the Civil War between 1865 and 1870

 

a. the economy went into a deep post-war depression

b. the economy expanded rapidly increasing GNP by almost 50 percent

c. continuous processing technology and the assembly line developed in arms manufacturing during the war now dominated all Northern manufacturing

d. the CIO was founded

e. none of the above

 

4. Which of the following is not a factor helping explain the technical backwardness of western hemisphere societies compared to eastern hemisphere societies around 1400?

 

a. The western hemisphere’s north-south orientation compared to the eastern hemisphere’s east-west orientation

b. The limited numbers of large species available for draft animals in the western hemisphere relative to the eastern hemisphere

c. The relative immunity of peoples in the eastern hemisphere to infectious diseases compared to peoples in the western hemisphere

d. The greater impact mass extinctions had on the large animals of the western hemisphere compared to the eastern hemisphere

e. The earlier development of agriculture in the eastern hemisphere

 

5. Which of the following is among the advantages of the detailed division of labor?

 

a. It facilitates financial development.

b. It facilitates mechanization.

c. It facilitates the growth of the secondary sector.

d. It facilitates the growth of markets.

e. It facilitates the growth of money.

 

6. The colonial firm was general in its functions.  Which of the following was not a function of the colonial firm?

 

a. finance

b. production

c. transportation

d. generalization

e. sales

 

7. Both the detailed division of labor and the specialized firm

 

a. were outcomes of the Civil War

b. needed growing markets

c. occurred first in the United States

d. developed initially through the innovative activities of Cornelius Vanderbuilt

e. all of the above

 

8.  The market or capitalist system which first developed in new England and the Mid-Atlantic states spread west while including increasingly more people in it in the East

 

a. because it was a system of exchange based on equivalence among anonymous participants and consequently could embrace a geographically wider social division of labor and increasing numbers of relative strangers.

b. because it was a system which developed specialized firms capable of transacting a higher volume business than previous, generalized firms while it used the market to coordinate that higher volume of business across a wider area and among a larger number of people.

c. because it was a system which developed factories which could coordinate a more detailed division of labor than was possible using the market mechanism, and that detailed division of labor allowed more people to qualify for manufacturing labor while it facilitated mechanization.

d. because it became a system where power was based on profits and profits came from the economic growth of the firm which consequently embedded into the system a drive to grow.

e. all of the above.

 

9. Agriculture

 

a. first began in South Asia (that is, the Indian subcontinent) and spread from there east and west along the temperate corridor

b. prior to 1400 in the western hemisphere entailed a limited number of food crops

c. prior to 1400 in the western hemisphere entailed relatively few domesticated animals

d. in the fertile crescent involved the early domestication of  sheep, goats and cattle

e. in Mesoamerica involved the early domestication of the donkey but the mule came only after Europeans brought horses

 

10. The Chinese in California were

 

a.  the first wage laborers to be employed by manufacturers in San Francisco

b.  excluded from all mining occupations in the California gold fields in the 1850s

c.   located primarily in Central California gold mines while whites were in the North

d.   located in the same mines that whites worked but were excluded from the best jobs such as blasting

e. worked along side whites miners in the same jobs because competition forced an integration of the mining labor force