course/instructor evaluation report  

 

 

Course:

ECON 5120-001, Spring 2004

Title:

Labor Law/Col Barg

Instructor:

PHILIPS,PETER W

 

 

   

Forms Received:

27

 

·                     The Course column below lists the percentage of students who supplied that response for the item, followed by the number of students who supplied that response.

·                     The Instructor column below list the percentage of students who supplied that response for the item for the instructor listed, followed by the number of students who supplied that response.

·                     The Subject column lists the percentage of students who supplied that response for the item for all courses and instructors in this subject (ECON) and term (Spring 2004).

·                     The University column lists the percentage of students who supplied that response for that item for all courses and instructors which were evaluated this term (Spring 2004).

 

Course Items

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The course objectives were clearly stated.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

37.0%

(10)

35.6%

43.0%

Agree

55.6%

(15)

48.6%

41.0%

Somewhat Agree

7.4%

(2)

10.9%

10.0%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.0%

2.7%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.4%

1.6%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.5%

1.7%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The course objectives were met.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

42.3%

(11)

34.0%

41.5%

Agree

46.2%

(12)

48.4%

40.6%

Somewhat Agree

11.5%

(3)

12.6%

11.2%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.4%

3.2%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.4%

1.8%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.3%

1.8%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The course content was well organized.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

40.7%

(11)

38.5%

42.5%

Agree

44.4%

(12)

40.0%

35.1%

Somewhat Agree

11.1%

(3)

13.5%

12.7%

Somewhat Disagree

3.7%

(1)

3.9%

4.5%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.9%

2.7%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.1%

2.4%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The course materials were helpful in meeting course objectives.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

40.7%

(11)

37.2%

41.3%

Agree

55.6%

(15)

40.4%

35.9%

Somewhat Agree

3.7%

(1)

14.3%

12.9%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

4.4%

4.6%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.7%

2.7%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.1%

2.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Assignments and exams reflected what was covered in the course.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

50.0%

(13)

42.9%

44.6%

Agree

38.5%

(10)

38.3%

35.6%

Somewhat Agree

11.5%

(3)

12.4%

11.1%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.3%

4.0%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.2%

2.2%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.9%

2.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 I learned a great deal in this course.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

48.1%

(13)

35.7%

43.7%

Agree

40.7%

(11)

37.8%

32.4%

Somewhat Agree

7.4%

(2)

17.6%

13.7%

Somewhat Disagree

3.7%

(1)

4.4%

4.3%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.3%

2.9%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.2%

2.9%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Overall, this was an effective course.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

42.3%

(11)

35.7%

42.7%

Agree

53.8%

(14)

40.6%

34.7%

Somewhat Agree

3.8%

(1)

14.8%

12.3%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

4.1%

4.2%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.6%

3.0%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.2%

3.1%

 

 

 

 

 

Instructor Items: PHILIPS,PETER W

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The instructor was organized.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

44.4%

(12)

43.0%

44.1%

Agree

40.7%

(11)

40.6%

36.9%

Somewhat Agree

14.8%

(4)

10.4%

11.0%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.1%

3.7%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.3%

2.1%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.6%

2.2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The instructor was available for consultation with students.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

64.0%

(16)

42.9%

47.6%

Agree

36.0%

(9)

40.9%

35.5%

Somewhat Agree

0.0%

(0)

12.0%

10.6%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.1%

3.0%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

0.9%

1.5%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.3%

1.9%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The instructor demonstrated thorough knowledge of the subject.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

88.9%

(24)

57.1%

58.6%

Agree

11.1%

(3)

32.1%

30.2%

Somewhat Agree

0.0%

(0)

7.0%

7.1%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.6%

1.8%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.1%

0.9%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.1%

1.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The instructor presented course content effectively.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

53.8%

(14)

39.5%

43.2%

Agree

38.5%

(10)

35.7%

32.0%

Somewhat Agree

7.7%

(2)

14.0%

13.2%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

5.0%

5.4%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.1%

3.1%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.6%

3.1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The instructor created/supported a classroom environment that was respectful.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

57.7%

(15)

49.7%

51.0%

Agree

38.5%

(10)

38.0%

34.2%

Somewhat Agree

3.8%

(1)

8.0%

8.4%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.2%

2.8%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.0%

1.5%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.2%

2.2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 As appropriate, the instructor encouraged questions and opinions.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

63.0%

(17)

52.1%

52.8%

Agree

29.6%

(8)

34.0%

32.2%

Somewhat Agree

7.4%

(2)

8.9%

8.9%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.6%

2.7%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.1%

1.5%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.3%

2.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Overall, this was an effective instructor.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

66.7%

(18)

45.5%

48.0%

Agree

29.6%

(8)

37.0%

33.2%

Somewhat Agree

3.7%

(1)

9.8%

10.0%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.2%

3.6%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.4%

2.5%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.1%

2.8%

 

 

Mon Jun 05 12:53:48 MDT 2006, © University of Utah
This page is maintained by Administrative Computing Services. 
Please send comments to webmaster@acs.utah.edu
Disclaimer