course/instructor evaluation report  

 

 

Course:

ECON 7590-001, Spring 2005

Title:

Econometrics

Instructor:

PHILIPS,PETER W

 

 

   

Forms Received:

10

 

·                     The Course column below lists the percentage of students who supplied that response for the item, followed by the number of students who supplied that response.

·                     The Instructor column below list the percentage of students who supplied that response for the item for the instructor listed, followed by the number of students who supplied that response.

·                     The Subject column lists the percentage of students who supplied that response for the item for all courses and instructors in this subject (ECON) and term (Spring 2005).

·                     The University column lists the percentage of students who supplied that response for that item for all courses and instructors which were evaluated this term (Spring 2005).

 

Course Items

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The course objectives were clearly stated.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

70.0%

(7)

42.7%

45.2%

Agree

20.0%

(2)

38.0%

38.7%

Somewhat Agree

0.0%

(0)

10.3%

9.4%

Somewhat Disagree

10.0%

(1)

3.5%

2.6%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.1%

1.7%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.4%

2.4%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The course objectives were met.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

60.0%

(6)

41.9%

43.9%

Agree

30.0%

(3)

37.2%

38.2%

Somewhat Agree

0.0%

(0)

10.7%

10.5%

Somewhat Disagree

10.0%

(1)

4.1%

3.0%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.8%

1.8%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.1%

2.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The course content was well organized.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

50.0%

(5)

43.0%

44.6%

Agree

30.0%

(3)

33.3%

34.1%

Somewhat Agree

10.0%

(1)

11.5%

11.5%

Somewhat Disagree

10.0%

(1)

5.3%

4.3%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.6%

2.4%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

4.2%

3.2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The course materials were helpful in meeting course objectives.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

60.0%

(6)

42.4%

43.9%

Agree

30.0%

(3)

33.0%

34.2%

Somewhat Agree

10.0%

(1)

11.5%

11.8%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

5.1%

4.3%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.4%

2.6%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

4.5%

3.2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Assignments and exams reflected what was covered in the course.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

60.0%

(6)

45.3%

46.6%

Agree

30.0%

(3)

32.0%

34.1%

Somewhat Agree

10.0%

(1)

11.0%

10.4%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

4.9%

3.7%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.3%

2.2%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

4.4%

3.1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 I learned a great deal in this course.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

70.0%

(7)

41.4%

45.7%

Agree

20.0%

(2)

32.5%

31.5%

Somewhat Agree

0.0%

(0)

13.3%

12.3%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

4.7%

4.1%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.1%

2.8%

Strongly Disagree

10.0%

(1)

5.0%

3.6%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Overall, this was an effective course.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

55.6%

(5)

41.3%

44.7%

Agree

44.4%

(4)

33.3%

33.6%

Somewhat Agree

0.0%

(0)

12.1%

11.1%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

4.7%

3.9%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.9%

2.8%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

4.7%

3.8%

 

 

 

 

 

Instructor Items: PHILIPS,PETER W

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The instructor was organized.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

50.0%

(5)

45.6%

47.6%

Agree

40.0%

(4)

33.6%

35.4%

Somewhat Agree

10.0%

(1)

12.0%

9.7%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.2%

2.9%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.1%

1.9%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.6%

2.6%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The instructor was available for consultation with students.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

80.0%

(8)

49.4%

51.5%

Agree

10.0%

(1)

32.8%

32.4%

Somewhat Agree

10.0%

(1)

10.0%

9.4%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.0%

2.8%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.5%

1.4%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.4%

2.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The instructor demonstrated thorough knowledge of the subject.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

80.0%

(8)

54.7%

60.2%

Agree

10.0%

(1)

30.4%

28.8%

Somewhat Agree

10.0%

(1)

9.3%

6.4%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.7%

1.6%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.1%

1.0%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.9%

2.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The instructor presented course content effectively.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

70.0%

(7)

43.4%

47.2%

Agree

20.0%

(2)

28.7%

30.4%

Somewhat Agree

10.0%

(1)

13.3%

11.6%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

5.7%

4.6%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.6%

2.7%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

5.3%

3.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The instructor created/supported a classroom environment that was respectful.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

80.0%

(8)

49.4%

54.0%

Agree

10.0%

(1)

31.3%

31.7%

Somewhat Agree

10.0%

(1)

11.3%

7.8%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.9%

2.5%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.4%

1.4%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.7%

2.7%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 As appropriate, the instructor encouraged questions and opinions.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

90.0%

(9)

50.5%

55.2%

Agree

10.0%

(1)

30.2%

29.8%

Somewhat Agree

0.0%

(0)

10.6%

8.3%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.6%

2.7%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.5%

1.4%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.5%

2.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Overall, this was an effective instructor.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

80.0%

(8)

46.4%

51.3%

Agree

10.0%

(1)

30.9%

30.9%

Somewhat Agree

10.0%

(1)

10.3%

9.0%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

4.4%

3.2%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.2%

2.3%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

4.7%

3.4%

 

 

Mon Jun 05 12:51:19 MDT 2006, © University of Utah
This page is maintained by Administrative Computing Services. 
Please send comments to webmaster@acs.utah.edu
Disclaimer